• Gerpott, TJ Biased Choice of a Mobile Phone Tariff Type: Exploring Perceptions of Usage Limits as a Cognitive Cause in Choosing Between a Usage-Based Plan or a Bundle. Telemat. Inform. 26167-179 (2009).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Berg, J. Income security in the gig economy: findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comp. Labor law policy J. 37543-576 (2015).

    Google Scholar

  • Husk, K. et al. What approaches to social prescription work, for whom and in what circumstances? A realistic review. Health Soc. community of care 28309-324 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. Realistic assessment (Wise, 1997).

  • Wong, G et al. RAMESES II reporting standards for realistic assessments. BMC Med. 1496 (2016).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. Realistic assessment (Sage, 2004); http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf

  • Her Majesty’s Treasury. Magenta Book 2020: Additional Guide: Realistic assessment (HM Treasury, 2020); https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/879435/Magenta_Book_supplementary_guide._Realist_Evaluation.pdf

  • Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. & Walshe, K. Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy ten21–34 (2005).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J. & Pawson, R. RAMESES Publishing Standards: Realist Summaries. BMC Med. 1121 (2013).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. & Walshe, KHC Realist Synthesis: An Introduction (ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester, 2004).

  • Emmel, N., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Monaghan, M. and Dalkin, S. (eds) Do realistic research (Wise, 2018); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451729

  • Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. in Assessment for the 21st century: A manual405–418 (Sage, 1997); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348896.n29

  • Marchal, B., Kegels, G. & Van Belle, S. en Do realistic research (eds Emmel, N. et al.) 79–90 (Sage, 2018); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451729.n6

  • The RAMESES II project. ‘The theoryin realistic assessment (Ramses Project, 2017); https://www.ramesesproject.org/media/RAMESES_II_Theory_in_realist_evaluation.pdf

  • Dalkin, SM, Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B. & Lhussier, M. What is in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realistic evaluation. Implement. Science. ten49 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Greenhalgh, J. & Manzano, A. Understanding “Context” in Realistic Assessment and Synthesis. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodology. 01–13 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1918484.

  • Westhorp, G. in Do realistic research (eds Emmel, N. et al.) 41–58 (Sage, 2018); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451729.n4

  • Emmel, N., Manzano, A., Dalkin, S., Monaghan, M. & Greenhalgh, J. in Make a realistic assessment, synthesis and research (Wise, 2018); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451729.n1

  • Astbury, B. in Do realistic research (eds Emmel, N. et al.) 59–78 (Sage, 2018); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451729.n5

  • Brand-Correa, LI & Steinberger, JK A framework for decoupling the satisfaction of human needs from energy consumption. School. Econ. 14143–52 (2017).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Wood, N. & Roelich, K. Tensions, capabilities, and justice in fossil fuel climate change mitigation. Energy Res. Soc. Science. 52114-122 (2019).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Siciliano, G., Urban, F., Tan-Mullins, M. & Mohan, G. Large dams, energy justice and the divergence between international, national and local development needs and priorities in countries of the South. Energy Res. Soc. Science. 41199-209 (2018).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Sovacool, BK, Lipson, MM & Chard, R. Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in low-carbon household innovations. Energy policy 128495–504 (2019).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Roddis, P., Carver, S., Dallimer, M., Norman, P. & Ziv, G. The role of community acceptance in planning outcomes for onshore wind and solar farms: an analysis of the energy justice. Appl. Energy 226353–364 (2018).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Schlosberg, D. Reimagining Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories. About. Policy 13517-540 (2004).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Bouzarovski, S. & Petrova, S. A global perspective on household energy deprivation: overcoming the energy poverty-energy poverty nexus. Energy Res. Soc. Science. ten31–40 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Day, R., Walker, G. & Simcock, N. Conceptualizing Energy Use and Energy Poverty Using a Capabilities Framework. Energy policy 93255-264 (2016).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Robinson, C., Bouzarovski, S. & Lindley, S. Underrepresentation of neighborhood vulnerabilities? Measuring energy poverty in England. About. Plan A https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18764121 (2018).

  • Middlemiss, L. Energy poverty: understanding and addressing systemic inequalities. Energy Inequality https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817674-0.00005-9 (2020).

  • Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Sustainable heat: protecting vulnerable households in England (Business Department, 2021).

  • Middlemiss, L. & Gillard, R. Energy poverty from the bottom up: characterizing household energy vulnerability through the lived experience of people in energy poverty. Energy Res. Soc. Science. 6146-154 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Fox, N. Here Comes the Sun: the evolution of a future project within a social housing estate (University of Sussex, 2018).

  • Bale, CSE, Varga, L. & Foxon, TJ Energy and Complexity: New Ways Forward. Appl. Energy 138150-159 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Parrish, B., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R. & Sovacool, BK A systematic review of the motivations, facilitators, and barriers to consumer engagement with residential demand response. Energy policy 138111221 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Heptonstall, PJ & Gross, RJK A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids. Nat. Energy 672–83 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • McAndrew, R., Mulcahy, R., Gordon, R., and Russell-Bennett, R. Household Energy Efficiency Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Energy policy 150112136 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Sorrell, S. Improving the evidence base for energy policy: the role of systematic reviews. Energy policy 351858–1871 (2007).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Hanna, R., Parrish, B. & Gross, R. Best practices in heat decarbonization policy: a review of international policy experience to promote the adoption of low-carbon heat supply. carbon (UKERC, 2016); https://ukerc.ac.uk/project/best-practice-in-heat-decarbonisation-policy/

  • Pawson, R. Evidence-Based Policy: a realistic perspective (Sage, 2006).

  • Greenhalgh, T. et al. Research scenarios in the diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc. Science. Med. 61417–430 (2005).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Theory of Change Center. What is the Theory of Change? (Theory of Change Center); https://www.theoryofchange.org/what-is-theory-of-change/

  • Blamey, A. & Mackenzie, M. Theories of change and realistic evaluation: peas in a pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation 13439–455 (2007).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Rolfe, S. Combining Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation in Practice: Lessons from Evaluation Research. Evaluation 25294–316 (2019).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Willand, N., Maller, C. & Ridley, I. Understanding the contextual influences of health outcomes of residential energy efficiency interventions: a realist review. House. Standard. 351–28 (2020).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Willand, N., Ridley, I. & Maller, C. Towards an explanation of the health impacts of residential energy efficiency interventions – a realist review. Part 1: route. Soc. Science. Med. 133191-201 (2015).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Middlemiss, L. et al. Energy poverty and social relations: a capability approach. Energy Res. Soc. Science. 55227-235 (2019).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Fell, MJ Anticipating the Distributive Impacts of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: Inference from a Realistic Review of Airbnb Evidence. To clean. Cons. responsible. 2100013 (2021).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • Edelman, B., Luca, M. & Svirsky, D. Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experience. A m. Econ. J.Appl. Econ. 91–22 (2017).

    Article

    Google Scholar

  • RAMESES projects. Welcome to ramesesproject.org. https://www.ramesesproject.org/Home_Page.php